tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34175158.post4594426429334339158..comments2023-09-26T10:38:35.085-04:00Comments on ImageFiction: Two Painters And A BlondeTedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07869579042505598957noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34175158.post-64976632121589086582007-02-24T14:51:00.000-05:002007-02-24T14:51:00.000-05:00A fantastic picture Ted, as alwaysRegardsAlistairA fantastic picture Ted, as always<BR/><BR/>Regards<BR/><BR/>AlistairAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34175158.post-52910782283232175262007-02-16T18:22:00.000-05:002007-02-16T18:22:00.000-05:00Cinematic? Craig Tanner would call it story, right...Cinematic? Craig Tanner would call it story, right? You know what Tanner means by story. Is it the same as your cinematic quality? Probably not. It is more. Your's I mean.<BR/><BR/>Yes, there can. Probably not many of my images have it, probably none, but I am sure there can be something like that and I am sure this particular image of your's has it.<BR/><BR/>So has your image "Mel Hess & Andreashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15992874945092411553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34175158.post-14259786709098866722007-02-13T11:25:00.000-05:002007-02-13T11:25:00.000-05:00"Can there be a cinematic quality to still photogr..."Can there be a cinematic quality to still photography?" <BR/><BR/>Interesting question. I suppose it certainly can, as some of the most interesting images always seem to transcend the single frame and invite the viewer to explore beyond its boundries. But to me the most attractive thing about photography is the singular power of composition. I'm still working on getting that right. When its mcmurmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404279104269917386noreply@blogger.com